Category: Feminist Things

women in charge

Study: Less than 1/3 of Top Jobs in UK Held by Women

BBC Reports that women make up less than a third of senior positions when considering 11 main sectors including politics, business and law.

“Men outnumber women by four to one in Parliament and only a third of local councillors are women,” the group’s Preethi Sundaram said.

“When we look at the top quarters of power in the political world there are only five women there out of 22… It’s quite an appalling fact really.”

Read more at BBC News.

About these ads
Women Make Up 7.5% of Top 'Fortune 500' Earners!

Women Make Up 7.5% of ‘Fortune 500′ Top Earners

The Catalyst Census found that, in 2011, only a measly 7.5% of top earners at Fortune 500 companies were women. In addition, the study found that last year women held only 14.1% of Executive Officer positions at the nation’s top corporations, and  27.4% of Fortune 500 companies didn’t even bother hiring a woman for an executive officer.

These statistics are especially troubling when considering the recent rise of Occupy Patriarchy and their collection of complaints of gender inequality in the Occupy Movement. Women are reportedly being ostracized, and their issues and contributions minimized. Some women are even cut from the live streaming cameras.

As the 99% fights against the 1%, we must also fight against the gender inequality in corporate governance. We must fight against gender inequality in political governance, and we must make sure that the  slogan of “99%” truly represents the ninety-nine percent!

When women are prevented from holding leadership positions, it effects issues like health care, equal pay, worker’s rights and poverty legislation, as women are most negatively affected in these areas. It is sad to hear that the disproportionate control over political power between men and women continues inside the Occupy movement. Even from a grassroots level, women are being removed from the public discussion!

squatting childbirth

Benefits of Squatting for Childbirth

Even though most women give birth while on their backs, research overwhelmingly shows that this is the worst position to be in during childbirth.

Advantages of squatting include:

  • Shortened pushing phase (2nd stage of labor)
  • Decreased need for forcep deliveries
  • Reduced need for episiotomy
  • Shortened birth canal depth
  • Decreased labor time due, because we are  working with gravity
  • Pelvic diameter is increased

This is because squatting tilts the pelvis and uterus forward, properly aligning the baby for successful birth. Squatting also increases the frequency and intensity of contractions, while the position also relieves back pressure. These many advantages of squatting during childbirth have long been known and documented via research, yet practitioners continue to promote a supine position for their own convenience. But what about you?

Read more on about.com and wikipedia

Women are Like Men ~ Just Cheaper

We need to pay attention to the fact that nationally American women earn only 81 cents for every male dollar! And this trend of inequality is consistent across America, with the median income for women being lower than men in all 50 states.

 And a recent research study presented some frustrating numbers on blatant prejudice against female professionals, described by the Washington Post as follows

“The research focused on career paths of high-potential men and women, drawing on thousands of MBA graduates from top schools around the world. Catalyst found that, among those who had moved on from their first post-MBA job, there was no significant difference in the proportion of women and men who asked for increased compensation or a higher position.

Yet the rewards were different.

Women who initiated such conversations and changed jobs post MBA experiencedslower compensation growth than the women who stayed put. For men, on the other hand, it paid off to change jobs and negotiate for higher salaries—they earned more than men who stayed did. And we saw that as both men’s and women’s careers progress, the gender gap in level and pay gets even wider.”

Especially following the recent Wall-Mart scandal regarding unequal pay, it is clear that there is inferior value placed on women compared to men in the workplace. Isn’t it time we demand equal treatment?

Read more at ThinkProgress.com


Florida Bill: Abortion a Felony with Life Sentence

Florida state Rep. Charles Van Zant (R) begins the new year with a radical new bill that aims to ban abortions in his state. The “crime” of conducting an abortion would be considered a felony, unless the mother’s life was directly at risk. Raped? Too bad.

Read more at Thinkprogress.com

 

Alert: We Are Treating Women like Sh*t!

Objectification has consequences.

As 2012 is right around the corner, we have to be honest with ourselves regarding the fact that women are still treated like shit in most countries around the world, even here at home. We hear of women not being able to drive in Saudi Arabia, and imprisonment of rape victims in Afghanistan. However, we often assume that our women receive more equal treatment here in the Westernized world. Even though we may be slightly better off than our middle-eastern counterparts, I would also argue that the treatment of women in the US and Europe has gotten worse.

1 in 4 American women experience domestic violence in their lifetime.

We see a wave of right-wing laws controlling women’s reproduction, even calling for IUD users to be considered mass murderers! We also see increased objectification of women in the western world, with continued nudity and massive amounts of photoshopping of skinny stars and models. Apparently an anorexic waif is still not skinny enough. Also, women are still greatly discriminated against in terms of pay and opportunities for advancement.

Photoshop Fail! Avril is missing a piece of arm due to her altered waist.

But the most damaging attack on women is more psychological, pervasive and less apparent: objectification of girls, followed by the normalization and encouragement of sexual violence against these objectified (and thus ‘deserving’) girls. This psychological cycle is quite dangerous. First we prop up young women who are naked and photoshopped, indicating that this is what society values. Next, we encourage men to treat women as sexual toys ready for their pleasure and taking. And finally, we blame the victims for the attacks. Their clothes were too skimpy or they were drunk, rape clearly being the appropriate punishment.

An ad against heavy drinking by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, blaming the victim.

So how do we encourage violence against women? A recent British study looked at British men’s magazines and statements made by convicted rapists, and found that most individuals could not tell them apart. Here is a sample:

There’s a certain way you can tell that a girl wants to have sex . . . The way they dress, they flaunt themselves.

Some girls walk around in short-shorts . . . showing their body off . . . It just starts a man thinking that if he gets something like that, what can he do with it?

Mascara running down the cheeks means they’ve just been crying, and it was probably your fault . . . but you can cheer up the miserable beauty with a bit of the old in and out. 

What burns me up sometimes about girls is dick-teasers. They lead a man on and then shut him off right there.

Filthy talk can be such a turn on for a girl . . . no one wants to be shagged by a mouse . . . A few compliments won’t do any harm either . . . ‘I bet you want it from behind you dirty whore’ . . .

You know girls in general are all right. But some of them are bitches . . . The bitches are the type that . . . need to have it stuffed to them hard and heavy.

You’ll find most girls will be reluctant about going to bed with somebody or crawling in the back seat of a car . . . But you can usually seduce them, and they’ll do it willingly.

Girls ask for it by wearing these mini-skirts and hotpants . . . they’re just displaying their body . . . Whether they realize it or not they’re saying, ‘Hey, I’ve got a beautiful body, and it’s yours if you want it.’

You do not want to be caught red-handed . . . go and smash her on a park bench. That used to be my trick.

Some women are domineering, but I think it’s more or less the man who should put his foot down. The man is supposed to be the man. If he acts the man, the woman won’t be domineering.

I think if a law is passed, there should be a dress code . . . When girls dress in those short skirts and things like that, they’re just asking for it.

Girls love being tied up . . . it gives them the chance to be the helpless victim.

I think girls are like plasticine, if you warm them up you can do anything you want with them.

A never-ending supply of naked and objectified women gracing magazine covers.

To find out which quote is from a convicted rapist or from a man’s mag, read about the study at Jezebel. Unfortunately the encouragement of violence against women also brings up the actual numbers. The CDC found in a 2005 study that 1 in 4 women in the United States are victims of domestic violence at some point in their lives and RAINN reported that there were 248,300 sexual assault victims in 2007. In addition, we are seeing laws being passed to punish and jail women based on their role in the reproductive process. I feel that the objectification of women makes it easier for others to hurt and attack her, and thus also indirectly contributes to violence against women. After all, an object feels no pain and has no emotions, and is never quite equal to a human life.  


Raped Afghan Women Sentenced for “Moral Crimes”

The European Union recently blocked the release of a documentary commissioned by the EU about Afghan women in prison for moral crimes, known as Zina. The film follows two girls, one who was raped and another who ran away from domestic violence/ The documentary highlights the many injustices and human rights violations currently being carried out against women in Afghanistan. And even though the Afghan women had made recent strides in women’s rights, the film points out  that sentencing of women for moral crimes has gone up.

Half of female prisoners in Afghanistan are sentenced for “moral crimes,” which Human Rights Watch estimates to be in the hundreds. These women are imprisoned for anywhere from 2 to 12 years, and sometimes there is a way out: in the case of rape you can choose to marry your rapist.

And when these poor women are set free? They have to worry about being murdered by their family members for bringing shame. One source quotes ”Quite a few of them feel like they’re going to be forced back into the abusive situation that they escaped from and some have said very clearly that they expect their families are likely to kill them, because they’ve brought shame on their families by ending up in prison.”

The reason the release was blocked, an EU official stated, was to protect the safety of the women in the film.

Read more here.

Equality in the Workplace

Women collect nearly 60 percent of four-year degrees in the United States, and they make up close to 50% of the workforce.

However, our progress at gaining senior leadership positions is not as impressive.  Last year, women held about 14 percent of senior executive positions at Fortune 500 companies, and worse, that number has barely budged since 2005!! So what is keeping women from taking charge? Ilene Lang, President and Chief Executive of Catalyst (a research firm looking at women in the workplace), finds that it is influenced by “entrenched sexism,” which both men and women are unconsciously influenced by. Women are often taught not to show their aggression like men, and competitiveness is often less valued in young women.

She continues by saying, “I don’t want to blame this on men,” rather “social norms that are so gendered and so stereotyped that even though we think we’ve gone past them, we really haven’t.”

The bar is set much higher for women, and men are able to get away with a lot more. It is like men are judged for their potential, while a woman has to prove herself multiple times. Companies must make a commitment to the advancement of women by promoting and mentoring them, and accurately measuring their progress.

Read more at The New York Times

Wiretaps, Berlusconi & Sexualization in Italy

 

 

Not only is Berlusconi an Italian media mogul, he is also the Italian Prime Minister. The 74-year-old seems to have a sick, teenager-like obsession with young girls, and has set out to share this obsession with the nation. As Italy’s third richest man ($9 billion in 2010), he has his influences spread across television, newspapers, publishing, and cinema. Berlusconi owns the three largest national television channels, the leading Italian advertising and publicity agency, and the largest Italian publishing house.

You can see his disgusting influences on Italian television here. He made female objectification, female nudity and plastic surgery a regular backdrop to his shows, advertising and news.

Now, wiretaps released due to suspicions of Berlusconi’s involvement in a prostitution ring, show clearly his unhealthy obsession with young, sexualized girls. Wiretapped telephone conversations between Berlusconi and a businessman charged with recruiting female escorts for sex parties were made public Saturday.The transcripts include gems like Berlusconi saying that he tries to act like a “prime minister in his spare time,” and “not to bring tall [girls], as we are not tall” (Berlusconi is 5′ 5″). He also boasts to “having been with eight [girls] in one night, even though I could have had eleven.”

Read more at MSNBC

The 19th Amendment ~ 91 Years Later

  This week 91 years ago, the 19th Amendment was added to the US Constitution. It was finally ratified on August 18th, 1920, and prohibits any US citizen from being denied voting rights based on their sex.  Before the Amendment, the Constitution allowed states to determine the qualifications for voting, and most women were thus royally screwed over. The amendment took forty-two years to pass – 42 years!! Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton initially drafted and introduced the amendment in 1878, and it was an end result of the women’s suffrage movement, which fought for the right to vote for women at both the state and national level.

Now we are 91 years farther, and it seems that the fighting never ends. We are still embarrassingly under-represented in government, and some Americans are still trying to remove women’s rights at both the state and national level. Women still have to fight for their right to have an abortion, and only earn 78 cents on the dollar compared to men. Ugh.

This is also why we value our collaboration with http://amendment19.com. We must take action and keep protecting the results of years of hard work. Remember that Anthony and Stanton introduced the Amendment 42 years before it was passed! I guess progress is slow, but let’s make sure that none of our hard-earned rights slip away – and don’t give up fighting.

USA on to 2011 FIFA Women’s Word Cup Finals ~ not since ’99!

 

The USA women’s soccer team beat France 3-1 earlier today and is moving up to finals.  The women’s soccer team has not made it to finals since 1999, and will play against Japan in the final World Cup match. Japan reached finals today after their victory over Sweden.

Read more here.

17%

Today, in 2011, 17 out of 100 senators are women. There have been 39 women in the US Senate since its establishment in 1789. The first woman served in 1922. Out of the 39 women who have served as Senators,  13 were appointed – 7 to succeed their deceased husbands. Even though we make up approximately 50% of the population and workforce, we are not being fairly represented in government! No wonder politicians find it so easy to go after women’s rights.

Read more here.

Women Who Changed the World

Awesome, especially for those with short attention spans (not a lot of reading).

http://www.biographyonline.net/people/women-who-changed-world.html


Marriage Equality in NY State ~ We Are Moving Forward

News reporters are just now reporting that New York State senate has passed the same-sex marriage bill, which makes New York the 6th state to move toward marriage equality.

Marriage equality supporters have legalized marriage for same-sex couples in Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Iowa and the District of Columbia. Now that New York has joined the gang, we will hopefully gain greater momentum!

On Thursday night Obama spoke on the issue at a fundraiser in New York:

“I believe that gay couples deserve the same legal rights as every other couple in this country…there will be a day when every single American, gay or straight or lesbian or bisexual or transgender, is free to live and love as they see fit.”

Even though other things Obama was quoted saying were a bit more tepid (and frustrating), I am glad his opinions on the matter are “evolving.”

Pride Parade this weekend in NYC should be a good one. See you there!

Read more here, and here.

Wal-Mart Found not Responsible for Systematic Social Discrimination Against Women

NPR posted a news update that the Associated Press reported today that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Wal-Mart in a large sex discrimination lawsuit on behalf of about 1.5 million female employees. The women claimed that Wall Mart systematically discriminated against them based on their sex, but the US Supreme Court did not believe that Wal-Mart was capable of consistently discriminating against all women just for the reason of being a woman. The female employees however argue that allowing local supervisors discretion over employment matters, leads to consistent discrimination against women. The majority said:

“The basic theory of their case is that a strong and uniform ‘corporate culture’ permits bias against women to infect, perhaps subconsciously, the discretionary decision-making of each one of Wal-Mart’s thousands of managers — thereby making every woman at the company the victim of one common discriminatory practice.”

However, five out of the nine justices concurred that there were no grounds for the class action lawsuit. However, if female employees had won, they would have received tens of billions of dollars in back pay and damages. However, the Supreme Court stated,

“Without some glue holding the alleged reasons for all those decisions together, it will be impossible to say that examination of all the class members claims for relief will produce a common answer to the crucial question why was I disfavored.”

The problem here seems to be in the realm of social psychology and statistics (in this case the “glue”). When you look at wages of males and females at a giant corporation like Wal-Mart you can collect some very strong statistical evidence that indeed there is systematic discrimination against women. A simple student’s t-test comparing wages of males to females (taught in Intro to Stats) would show extremely convincing evidence of systematic discrimination, especially when conducted using a data set containing 3 million Wal-Mart employees (1.5 million females, and 1.5 million males). It would be a simple number to calculate. The question is whether the fact that our social environment systematically discriminates against women is Wal-Mart’s fault or responsibility? And the next question is whether we move women’s equality forward by legally enforcing it or by waiting for society to change on its own. What is your opinion?